Australians Want Lower Migration but Support Skilled Workers & International Students

A recent study has shed light on Australians’ complex and sometimes contradictory views on migration. While a majority believe migration levels are too high, they are largely supportive of skilled migrants and international students. The findings challenge common political narratives and highlight widespread misconceptions about immigration.

With immigration expected to be a key topic in the upcoming federal election, both major political parties have proposed policies to curb migration. However, the study suggests that when people receive new information, their opinions on migration often shift.

Public Sentiment: A Complex Perspective on Migration

The study, conducted by Australian National University researchers, surveyed over 5,000 Australians to assess public opinion on migration. Key findings indicate that:

• More than 50% of respondents believe migration levels are too high.
• Despite this, a majority oppose reducing international student numbers and skilled migration.
• Public perceptions of migration are often inaccurate, with many overestimating the number of international students and new migrants.

While concerns about migration persist, the study suggests that misinformation plays a significant role in shaping public attitudes. When given accurate data, many participants changed their views, showing that the migration debate is influenced by how information is presented.

Migration and the Housing Crisis: Political Rhetoric vs. Reality

Immigration has become a focal point in Australia’s political landscape, particularly in relation to the housing crisis. Both the government and opposition have signaled plans to cut migration levels in response to rising housing costs.

However, previous reports indicate that the link between migration and housing affordability is not as straightforward as some politicians claim. The post-pandemic surge in migration remains lower than pre-pandemic forecasts, and factors such as supply chain issues and construction costs also contribute significantly to housing shortages.

Shifting Opinions: The Power of Narrative in the Migration Debate

The study examined how public opinion changes based on different narratives about migration. Participants were divided into groups and exposed to different perspectives:

• A Positive Narrative: Suggested that skilled migrants, such as construction workers, help boost housing supply. This increased support for migration by 4.5%.
• A Negative Narrative: Claimed that high immigration leads to rising housing costs. This made respondents 6% more likely to oppose migration.
• A Balanced Narrative: Stated that foreign buyers influence the housing market, but only in a limited capacity.

These findings highlight the influence of framing in shaping public attitudes. When migration is presented as beneficial, people are more likely to support it. Conversely, negative messaging reinforces opposition.

The Role of International Students in Australia

One of the most notable contradictions in public opinion is the strong support for international students despite concerns over overall migration.

• More than 40% of respondents supported maintaining or increasing student numbers.
• Many Australians believe international students make up a larger proportion of the migrant population than they actually do.
• The 2016 census showed that around 20% of working-age migrants were students, but survey participants estimated this number at 38%.

International students contribute significantly to Australia’s economy and workforce. They support industries such as hospitality, retail, and healthcare, filling essential labor gaps. Their tuition fees also play a crucial role in funding universities and higher education institutions.

Common Misconceptions About Migration

The research highlighted widespread misconceptions about migration in Australia:

• Overestimation of Migrant Numbers: Respondents believed migration levels over the past decade were higher than they actually were.
• Misjudging Regional Origins: Many overestimated the number of migrants from the Middle East and Pacific regions while underestimating European migration.
• Uncertainty About Permanent vs. Temporary Migration: People often misinterpret the proportion of temporary visa holders versus permanent migrants.

These misunderstandings indicate a need for more transparent and fact-based discussions on migration policies.

Conclusion: A Need for Informed Debate on Migration Policy

The study demonstrates that Australians’ views on migration are shaped by both perception and information. While many believe migration levels are high, their opinions shift when presented with accurate data or different narratives.

With migration set to be a major election issue, policymakers must navigate public sentiment carefully. Ensuring that discussions around migration are evidence-based rather than driven by misconceptions will be crucial in shaping a balanced and effective immigration policy.