Universities are preparing for the Australian Labor Government's planned cap on overseas students, which aims to curb migration by limiting international student commencements. Education Minister Jason Clare emphasized that the cap, which will set the number of new international students at 270,000 in 2025, is designed to create a fairer system for the international education sector.
This includes 145,000 places for publicly funded universities, maintaining levels similar to 2023, and 95,000 for the vocational education sector, representing a 20% reduction from previous levels.
The government has communicated these caps to universities, with individual limits set for each institution. However, concerns have been raised, particularly by the Group of Eight, Australia’s leading research universities. The group estimates a 30% reduction in available places and criticizes the policy, citing potential damage to the sector and the lack of economic modeling to support the changes.
The caps are part of a broader strategy to manage migration, responding to public concerns about housing affordability amidst a surge in arrivals. Critics argue that the move may not address the root causes of the housing crisis and could harm Australia's reputation in international education.
Minister Clare acknowledged that the current system, influenced by Ministerial Direction 107, has already impacted universities, creating inequities that the new caps seek to rectify. This ministerial direction prioritized visa approvals for students attending top universities or pursuing multiple courses, leading to delays for other institutions. The government plans to repeal this directive to ensure a more equitable system.
Universities, particularly those in regional areas like the University of New England, are cautiously optimistic about their allocations but remain concerned about visa processing times. Meanwhile, training colleges are scrambling to adjust their plans with the new caps on the horizon.
The legislation to implement the caps has already passed the House of Representatives and is heading to the Senate, with opposition figures criticizing the chaotic process and unclear details surrounding the bill.