Amidst concerns voiced by the Reserve Bank governor regarding the impact of migration on the housing market, there's a growing debate over its significance. The government's housing supply and affordability council also pointed to the resumption of migration as a factor worsening the housing shortfall.
However, some individuals, including a housing spokesman, suggest that migration is not the primary driver of the crisis. They point to other factors such as government incentives for property investors, the absence of rent caps, and chronic underinvestment in public housing as key contributors.
Even during periods of reduced migration, such as during COVID-19, the housing crisis persisted, indicating that migration alone isn't the solution. Australia has experienced high rates of migration in the past without facing significant housing challenges, primarily because of government investments in public housing.
Despite a recent increase in migration and a forecasted growth rate, building approvals have fallen, suggesting a mismatch between demand and supply. While the government plans to address the crisis with housing policies in the upcoming federal budget, there's a call for a more comprehensive approach.
Critics emphasize that blaming migrants for the crisis overlooks deeper issues within Australia's housing system. They argue that treating homes as financial assets rather than essential dwellings have led to a significant number of vacant properties across the country, despite record-low vacancy rates.
In conclusion, while migration plays a role in housing demand, it's not the sole cause of the crisis. Addressing housing affordability requires a multifaceted approach that includes investment in public housing, regulation of property investment incentives, and a comprehensive housing policy framework.